(Graphic courtesy of Soahead.com)
Is Iran
a threat? Are they a threat to the US?
Are they are threat to her allies? Is Iran
a threat to the region? The answer to these questions are all, yes, they are.
However, they are a threat for different reasons to each entity. Israel
has long had problems with Iran.
It’s well documented and that will never cease; at least not in our lifetimes.
The Middle East region is very complicated and convoluted. With the Arab Spring now working
its way into other totalitarian regimes, established dictators and theocracy’s, the
region remains sensitive to any waves. Iran
is the most powerful state left in the Middle East. They
are predominately Shi’a Muslim’s (85%) while the rest of the region is overwhelmingly
Sunni Muslim (90%). If we remember the problems with the US
invasion and subsequent occupation of Iraq,
it was complications of various religious sects and the sectarian violence that ensued because of those divisions, was what caused the greatest problems.
Religion was also in part the basis for Iraq’s
invasion of Iran
in 1980 that lasted eight bloody years resulting in over 1 Million deaths. This
was the same war that the US
backed Saddam’s Sunni invasion supplying both weapons and intelligence to Iraq
in proxy war against the Shi’a Iranians. It was during and after the Iraq
invasion that Iran
became more isolated the ever before and when you include they speak a different
language (Persian) and have another belief system from their neighbors; it only
compounded the isolation.
Recently, there was the wikileaks cable that quoted Saudi
Ambassador to the US,
Adel al-Jubeir recalling King Abdullah of Saudi
Arabia urging the US
to attack Iran’s
nuclear program. To quote “cut the head off the snake (Iran)”. Last month, Saudi Oil Minister, Ali al-Naimi, said that the Kingdom will be able to make -up for any shortfall if Iran remains in a defensive posture; further indicating their approval for regime change.
"It is because of our ongoing investment that Saudi Arabia is able to
respond to shortages around the world - take issues with Libyan
production last year for example. 'And it's because of our investment that any future shortages will be handled."
In fact, most Arab nations do not receive the Iranians well and do not want
them to go nuclear. The Arab League has isolated Syria
(Iran’s only
ally) as it has halted both diplomatic and economic ties with
the nation. If that wasnt enough of a statement they will lend political and material support to
the Syrian opposition. It appears Syria
will come to some type of regime change similar to what happened in Egypt and Libya.
The Arab spring is said to be based on freedom of individuals and elections are
a part of that; if and when the revolution takes power, it will not replace the
leadership of Assad with a pro Iranian government.
What is happening is Iran
is walking the proverbial plank. They have no allies. Everyone around them
either wants their leadership removed or they simply don’t care either way. Both
bordering nations of Iran
have been vaporized by the United States.
Its only logical that another member of the “Axis of evil” stuck smack dab in
the middle of US occupations is next.
They know it and they also know they only have a few cards
to play. First, they must go nuclear BEFORE an attack, being that a nuclear
nation has yet to be attacked by the United
States. Will this deter them from being
attacked by the West? Nobody can say for sure, but it will at least give them
pause and possibly buy the Iranians more time. Secondly, and the Ace of Spades,
is that they will divorce themselves from the dollar.
With the drumbeat of war ratcheting up from the US
to heights not seen since 2002, Iran,
like its neighbor Iraq
once did, is poised to play chicken with the US
and its European allies engaging the US
in economic war. The first strike was launched by the US
in new sanctions signed by President Obama back in December and there was a
response by Tehran with a threat to
close the Strait of Hormuz.
Now, we have Belgium-based
SWIFT - who is a lifeline to international trade, as they oversee an average
of 18 million payment messages per day between banks in 210 countries prepared to cut off Iran,
virtually forcing international trade with Iran
to a standstill. This is a remarkable revelation and a clear indication of the
clout the US
still carries as the reserve currency of international trade. Never, has SWIFT
removed a nation since its inception in 1973.
"Kicking Iran
out of SWIFT is both unprecedented and another dangerous step toward turning a
financial war into a military conflict," said Reza Marashi, National
Iranian American Council's research director.
Not only does this hurt all Iranians, but more importantly it
hurts Iran’s
military as well. Without fuel you cannot mobilize your military and logistics
become impossible. Logistical failure has been the downfall of some of them
most important conflicts of the last 300 years and with Iran
being economically cut off it would inevitable. While Iran maybe the 3rd
largest supplier of crude in the world, it’s also relying on 40% of its petroleum and diesel consumption to come way of imports due to both refinery
dysfunction /inefficiencies and just flat out a shortage of new refineries. That however is being addressed and eventually Iran will not be so dependable on importing gasoline but yet still vulnerable if those refineries were knocked offline.
At one point, Iran was planning on getting out of the dollar as early as 2002 (if not long before) and
then Iraq (who
tried getting out of the dollar in 2000 after a decade of sanctions) got
blitzed and Tehran went eerily
silent. Then a few years later and coincidentally enough with the US
bogged down in two stagnate/unpopular wars... Tehran
began chatting aloud about dumping the dollar again. It was The Iranian Oil Bourse, created in 2008, that set the stage for this showdown that will
officially end the petrol-dollar relationship with Iranian crude oil beginning on March 20, 2012. That is just a little
over a month to go.
Now that we are facing our own debt problems, drawing down
from Iraq and Afghanistan
and have a President who may be perceived as weak, the Iranians threw down the
gauntlet. What are we to do? All this adds up to one thing and that is why
we are seeing a strong military presence in the Middle East,
coupled with tough talk from talking heads here in the states. I see a major
push to invoke war with the Iranians.
I've always felt and said that nuclear weapons and terrorism
have always been more of a perceived threat then an actual threat concerning the
Middle East. 9-11 was the exception and it wasn't state
sponsored either. Are nuclear weapons that much of a threat to warrant all this
attention? I have my reservations. Iran
has plenty of nations around them that don't particularly care for them and are
nuked up as well, and those that don’t posses nuclear capability's, I assume would be more then happy to have nukes
from the US/West planted on their soil as a deterrent.
Iran
maybe a nutty regime but mutual destruction is a deterrent to even the crazies,
no matter how much “cooze” Allah can (sic) promise. It’s simply a self
contained regional situation in spite of what the saber wavers might otherwise
say, even if they did get nukes. The idea of supporting terrorist and getting
nukes however is easier for people to grasp then how the Petrodollar recycling
machine works and its more inline with the average person’s moral views: good
vs evil is easier to understand vs then say what it really is and that is the Machiavellian battle of high vs low mach, or
some might say survival of the fittest.
Hell, the majority of the country does not even
believe in natural selection!? Can you really blame our government for running
with the: 'scary dudes in turbans, armed with rocket launchers and hiding in
caves reading Korans under camp fires - alongside a gaggle of virgins, who also want to
nuke you…because they hate you, because you are free' story?
That's where this web gets tangled. See, as Americans we like our standard of living. Is it inflated? Is it driven purely by consumption and debt? Is it made possible by a rigged game that allows us to trade pieces of paper for all types of goods and commodities that the rest of the world has to break their backs for? The answer to those questions is also - yes.
If it was just about nuclear weapons we would have eliminated North Korea's capability's long ago. If it was about terrorism, we would have went after our own allies like Saudi Arabia or never would have clandestinely funded so many right-wing gorilla operations in Latin and South America the last 50 years.
Anyone that threatened to flip the monopoly board over and not participate (and publicly denounce the petrodollar) in the petrodollar scheme and trade with other currencies, has already been or will be (Hugo Chavez) neutralized. From Libya - Iraq - former IMF chair Dominique Strauss-Kahn and now Iran.
With the Petrodollar recycling process being the single -
most vital element to the United States
hegemony, it is imperative and absolutely essential that nations (see OPEC)
continue to exchange their oil for US dollars. Or, the world as we know it here
in the States will be much different... and not for the better. You can rest assured, that we will be putting a boot up the Ayatollahs ass and carpet bombing the Caucasus before our leaders (see corporations) allow us to fall into that state.